Amazing Seminar by GIA on Exposing Hypocrisy of Leftist Intellectual brigade

Amazing Seminar by GIA on Exposing Hypocrisy of Leftist Intellectual brigade from Bengal to Bastar,from Award Wapsi gang to mob lynching. Released Fact Finding Report on Attack of Illegal Bangladeshi migrants on Mahagun society.

HYPOCRISY OF HATE INDIA BRIGADE – THE NATION KNOWS IT ALL

Hate India Brigade You cried on the lynching of Aqlakh and Junaid but maintained a deafening silence on the stabbing of Kartik Chandra Ghosh in Bengal. You labeled entire India as intolerant on the murder of Aqlakh in 2016, thronged Jantar Mantar with # Not In My Name Campaign on the lynching of Junaid. Whereas investigation shows that Junaid died due to dispute over sharing of seat in train but most irresponsibly and as an Anti- National act YOU attached beef and skull cap to the killing of Junaid. Why and what for? THE NATION KNOWS IT ALL.

Entire nation was branded as intolerant by the likes of you as soon as Modi government came to power with a huge mandate. YOU THE HAVES who have enjoyed the patronage of Congress- Communist nexus for long and have controlled public opinion through your spokespersons comprising of handful of journalists, professors, lawyers, NGOs, who could not digest a Chaiwala- “THE HAVE NOT” ruling Lutyen’s Delhi. Hence, you set the NARRATIVE that the Modi Government was intolerant to minorities, dalits and women.

You cherry picked the murders of Narendra Dhabolkar, Govind Pansare, and Kalbhurgi who insulted Hinduism and then blamed the Modi govt. for being intolerant to writers. Your loyalists like Nayantara Sehgal and 40 odd awardees were more than happy to return their awards to prove their loyalty to the Nehru -Gandhi family.

The issue of murder of Aqlakh was raised by you beyond national borders as if each and every Indian became intolerant and no Muslim was safe in India. This intolerance narrative continued till the result of Bihar elections was declared on 8 /11/2015 in which your favourite “Secular Alliance” of Nitish and Lalu Yadav won. Not a word on intolerance or any award returned after this day.

9th Feb. 2016 when Anti- India slogans were raised in JNU such as “Bharat tere tukde honge insha Allah, Bharat ki barbadi tak jung rahegi,” YOU raised your Anti- India, Anti- Modi rhetoric and justified these Anti- National slogans as Freedom of Speech and Expression. Your propaganda machinery in the media, Universities, courts, NGOs etc. which always has been well oiled was initiated and YOU distracted the debate to demanding removal of Sedition law.

The nation could not believe that in your Anti- National, Anti- Hindu, Anti- Modi narrative, intellectuals like you who have been nurtured by the congress- communist nexus will fail to make the distinction between govt. and the NATION.YOU were comfortable with the likes of Owaisis in saying that “I will not say Bharat Mata ki Jai”. The reality is that nation never wanted you to do lip service to the motherland by chanting Bharat Mata Ki Jai but believing in and working for Bharat tere tukde honge in your hearts and minds

YOU were seen advocating the cause of the terrorist Yakub Memon and forcing the Supreme Court to sit on midnight of July 2015 to hear his mercy petition. But shamelessly, in the same breath YOU called the Army Jawans in Kashmir as rapists and sexual assaulters and did not even spare the Chief of Army Staff and labeled him as “ Sadak Chhap Gunda.” Any self -respecting community can ill afford the cabal like you for whom the international terrorist becomes OSAMA JI and Chief of Army Staff becomes Sadak Chhap Gunda.

How can you not see that the people pelting stones at the Army are not innocent children who are trying to defend their Kashmiriyat. A normal child of India on seeing an Army Jawan says Jai Hind and does not dare to think of harming them. Regarding kashmiriyat, it died since long when lakhs of Kashmiri Hindus were forced to leave the valley or face death and now what is left in the valley is radical Islamiyat which shows itself often in the form of waving of ISIS – Pakistani flags, raising of Anti- India slogans etc. The nation feels ashamed of you when your Mani Shankar Aiyars embrace the terrorists/ Hurriyat leaders who insult the Indian Army every day.

YOU swear by Mahatma Gandhi and the Constitution of India more than Marx now a days just to show that you are more liberal than the liberals but butcher, cook and eat cows in the streets of Kerala to protest against the Government Notification on ban on sale -purchase of animals for slaughter in animal markets and smuggling of animals to Bangladesh. Intellectuals like YOU deliberately do not read a few pages of the Constitution of India which deal with prevention of cow slaughter Article 48 and the duty cast upon the govt. to prevent cruelty to animals.

Gau Rakshaks bother you but those butchering cows in the streets or smuggling them to Bangladesh for slaughter are seen as champions of Right To Eat and Right To Profession. Even the Prime Minister has castigated violence in the name of protection of cows but for YOU cow is Hindu and other animals are secular and hence only they are worth protection.

Indian nation is thousands of years old. When your masters in USSR were roaming in forests- uncivilized, we in India already had Vedas- the books of knowledge. Mahabharata was written by Ved Vyas, Ramayana by Valmiki. We have been hearing the pious relationship between Lord Ram and Shabri who was a tribal woman and also with Kewat who was a fisherman who was considered as his fifth brother by Lord Ram. Who does not know the strong bond between Lord Ram and Hanuman. The British created the atrocity literature exaggerating the atrocities committed within Hinduism on Shudras. We do not say that atrocities were not committed by the upper castes on the lower castes but majority of Hindus opposed the inhuman caste system and advocated for treating all as equal as our essential belief is Kan Kan mein Bhagwan. Hence, there is no distinction between a man, woman, an upper caste or a lower caste. But instead of bridging the gap, people like YOU always exploit the faultlines and have tried to pit one group against the other. How you exploited the incident of beating of 4 Dalits in Una, Gujarat and labeled all Hindus as anti-dalit. YOU conveniently chose to ignore that under UPA II more than 94 crimes were committed against dalits every single day between 2009- 2013 [ as per The National Crime Record Bureau Data (NCRB data)].

That under UPA Govt– 673 murders and 1557 rapes of dalits took place in 2011;
651 murders and 1576 rapes of dalits in 2012 ; 676 murders and 2073 rapes in 2013 i.e. 5 rapes every day. YOU never cried intolerance at that time and your conscience keepers did not return their awards. THE NATION KNOWS WHY.

Why is your Bhadralok of Bengal quiet on the genocide of Hindus and their exodus from Malda, Dhulagarh and now Bashirhat? Where is your freedom of speech brigade which supported the freedom of the painter Late Shri MF Hussain when he painted Bharat Mata as nude? The 17 year old boy Souvik Sarkar needs their support. Do not ask me who is Sauvik Sarkar. True, he is not MF Hussain or Kanhaiya Kumar. But he posted an objectionable post regarding Islam on Facebook. Police in Bengal arrested him. Police station at Baduria was gheraoed by Islamist mob shouting, Nara e Takbir -Allah ho Akbar through microphones and pressurizing the police to hand over the boy to them to be punished in accordance with Shariya Law i.e. punished to death for blasphemy. Therefafter, this radical Islamic mob went on a rampage and destroyed the properties and temples of Hindus shouting “Aryas go back. Not a word from your #Not InMyNameBrigade or your priests of freedom of speech? Does the little juvenile boy not deserve your sympathy? He is also of Junaid’s age. Or the fact remains that YOU will cry for Junaid but not for Sauvik or Kartik who was killed by this Jihadi mob a few days later.

My Hindustan becomes Lynchistan on the murder of Junaid but the nation was looking for you when thousands of Sikhs were lynched in the streets of Delhi by the Congress and also when Lakhs of Kashmiri Hindus were forced to leave Kashmir by the Islamists. The lynching of Dy.S.P. Ayub Pandit by Islamist mob in Kashmir or the killing of Lt. Fayaz in cold blood by terrorists- not a word from you. Obviously, they did not fit in your narrative.

The NATION has seen through your Anti- India, Anti- Hindu and Anti- Modi narrative which protects the jihadi –Mamata nexus in Bengal, justifies the terrorists in Kashmir and legitimizes the communist terror in Kerala. These are not isolated incidents but culmination of the pseudo secular mindset which protects the Jihadi-Leftist nexus which you so viciously defend. Time to pack your bags. THE NATION KNOWS IT ALL.

READ BEFORE YOU RIOT

mm
Open letter to Intellectuals on BEEF BAN.
My dear Secularists!You are in trouble. Why you did not read the notification dated 23/05/2017 which is titled “Prevention of Cruelity to Animals (Regulation of Livestock Markets) Rules, 2017before provoking the students and people in IITs, Colleges, Kerala, West Bengal, North-East& before organizing beef parties and cutting 18 month old calf in full public view in Kerala in protest.
Poor 18 month old calf would have been saved had you taken out 10 minutes time from your busy evening NDTV debates and read the nine page Notification.

Dear intellectuals, while you were busy organizing meetings of Dog Lovers and how to prevent cruelty to dogs (which I really appreciate) and discussing how the horse “Shaktiman” was kicked,you failed to realize that Government of India has not dared to take away your right to serve and eat beef at such noble get togethers.
Liberals, while you spent all your life holding seminars in Lutyens Delhi and filing cases in Courts in India regarding prevention of cruelty to animals, I and this country hoped that you would take some time to read the draft of the present notification which was put in public domain on 16/01/2017 and suggestions were invited to be given in 30 days and this was pursuant to directions of the Supreme Court in the matter of Gauri Maulekhi Versus Union Of IndiaW.P.(C) No.881/2014 in which the Hon’ble Supreme Court had directed on 13/07/2015 to frame guidelines to prevent animals from beings smuggled out of India to Nepal where large scale animal sacrifice took place.

Hon’ble Supreme Court had also directed the Central Government to draft and notify Rules regarding to live stock market and direction was given to frame such rules under Section 38 (1) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960.
My dear Animal Lovers, you being so busy hobnobbing from JNU to NDTV to Hurriyat Leaders, may be you did not get time to read the entire notification. Therefore, let me briefly state the main points of the notification which are as follows:
i. The rules are called “Prevention of Cruelity to Animals (Regulation of Livestock Markets) Rules, 2017 which are made under Section 38(1) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960.

ii. Cattle (Cow, Buffalo, Bull, Camel) cannot be brought to Animal Market for sale for slaughter or sacrifice.Cattle cannot be sold to a person outside the state without permission as per the state cattle prevention laws. When the cattle is sold proof of sale shall be given to purchaser, seller, Tehsil Office, Chief Veterinary Officer and to the Animal Market Committee.

iii. All existing Animal Markets will have to be registered within 3 months with the District Animal Monitoring Committee. The Committee shall ensure that Animal Market has adequate lighting, water, feeding area, Veterinary facility, toilets, provisions for disposal of dead animals etc.

iv. Cruel and harmful practices on animals including painting of horns, ear cutting in Buffaloes, making animals lay on hard ground, use of chemicals on body of animals, forcing animals to perform unnatural acts, nose cutting, ear slitting or cutting by knife or hot iron marking on animals for identification purposes etc. are prohibited.

v. Purchaser of cattle cannot sell animal for slaughter or sacrifice.

vi. Appointment of a Veterinary Officer to check the health of the animals.

vii. Prohibition of sale of unfit, ill and pregnant animals.

My dear intellectuals, from “Bharat tere tukde honge” to “Notification tere tukde honge” to “Cowtere tukde honge”, you never thought of reading and understanding the notification and jumped onto criticize, condemn and demolish it as beef ban.

My friends, I do not think that you go to animal market to purchase cow for slaughter and then eat it. Intellectuals like you, simply go to a shop, ask for a plate of beef and enjoy the luxury of eating beef discussing and debating how to reduce poverty in India.

So today also, you can very well go to the local shop keeper selling the delicacies of beef and eat it as you were eating earlier. This notification does not affect your right to eat beef. This notification only regulates the condition prevailing in the animal markets which were unhygienic and inhuman and suffocated the animals where 10 animals were put in a cage where only 5 could go in. Even Kerala High Court stated so recently in one of your petitions.

I am also sure that people like you who are the elite of society, opinion makers in the society are not affected by the notification which states that there will be no animal markets within 50 kilometers of International boarder or within 25 kilometers of State border.

My dear friends, entire India knows how you and your comrades have full faith in Constitution of India and Democracy because after the JNU incidentyou swore by the Indian Constitution much more than you swore by Marx saying “Bharat tere tukde honge” is Freedom of Speech under Article 19 of Constitution of India. I will remind you that the same Constitution of India by which you have been swearing also has Article 48 which directs Government to ban cow slaughter and Article 37 which says that Directive Principles of State Policy are fundamental to the governance of the country and the Government shall consider all of this in making policy.Reading of both the Articles together state that Government shall make a policy to ban cow slaughter in India.

I will also not remind you of how Mahatma Gandhi advocated for ban on cow slaughter and that worshiping of cow is fundamental and essential to Hinduism and it is protected under Article 25 of the Constitution of India under right to freedom of religion.

Kapil Sibal in the Hon’ble Supreme Court stated that Triple Talaq was fundamental and essential to Islam because it was practiced for over 1400 years. My dear intellectuals, may I remind you that worshiping of cow in India has been practiced for more than 5000 years.

Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mohd. Hanif Qureshi Vs. State of Biharhas stated that under Article 48, ban on cow slaughter is a valid law.

But why am I reminding you of the Constitutional provisions?You have such great intellectuals in media and battery of lawyers in Supreme Court who fight for your causes from Afzal Guru to Yakub Memon to Shahabuddin to Kanhaiya Kumar. But be careful, these lawyers have not reminded you that public butchering of an animal can land you in jail under Section 153A, 504, 505 IPC for causing grave provocation, promoting enmity, ill will, hatred, provoking breach of peace between variouscommunities. They have also not told you about the Apex Court judgment where it is categorically stated that slaughtering of animal can take place only in licensed slaughter houses and not anywhere and everywhere. Hence, you have right to eat but you do not have right to slaughter animals anywhere and everywhere. Laxmi Narayan Modi Vs UOIW.P.(C) 309 of 2003.

You cried for the stone pelters attacking the Indian Army, you shed tears at their wounds from the pellet guns and createdsympathy of the whole nation for those stone pelters. The scene of public butchering of 18 month old calf is more barbaric and more violent. Isn’t it?You could have uttered few words of sympathy for the poor calf who was murdered by the likes of you and more importantly it was murdered because you had not read the Government notification. So READ BEFORE YOU RIOT.

मुस्लिम महिला का सम्मान से जीने का हक

mm

तीन तलाक के मुद्दे पर सर्वोच्च न्यायालय में कपिल सिब्बल की दलील ने “धर्मनिरपेक्ष ब्रिगेड” के घूंघट को उठा दिया है , जो सती से, शनि मंदिर से जल्लीकट्टू तक मुखर रहे हैं लेकिन तीन तलाक पर “बहरापन की चुप्पी” रखी है। वास्तव में, जब उन्होंने कपिल सिब्बल की पसंद के माध्यम से बात की तो “मुसलमानों द्वारा 1400 साल बाद अभ्यास” के नाम पर समर्थक अमानवीय और बर्बर ट्रिपल तलाक थे।

ये धर्मनिरपेक्षता दोनों तथ्यों और कानूनों पर गलत हैं मुस्लिम तुष्टीकरण को समर्थन देने के लिए किसी भी हद तक जाने के लिए, उन्होंने भारत के संविधान को गुमराह किया और गलत बताया कि धर्म का मूल अधिकार सर्वोच्च और पूर्ण और समानता, स्वतंत्रता, गैर-भेदभाव और महिलाओं के लिए गरिमा के अधिकार से बेहतर है। । इसके अतिरिक्त अनुच्छेद 25 में स्पष्ट रूप से लिखा गया है कि केंद्र सरकार बहुमत के लिए कानून बना सकती है और सामाजिक कल्याण के लिए अल्पसंख्यक भी कर सकती है। ट्रिपल तलाक मनमानी, सनकी, अमानवीय और बर्बर है। यह महिलाओं की समानता स्वतंत्रता, गैर-भेदभाव और गरिमा का अधिकार का उल्लंघन करती है शाएरा बानो और आफरीन जैसे याचिकाकर्ताओं को कुरियर और पति की तरफ से तीन तलॉक दिए गए हैं। उनके पास कानून में कोई उपाय नहीं है और नहीं जानती कहां जाएं। इसलिए, उन्होंने तीन तलाक, बहुभुज और हलाला को गैरकानूनी घोषित करने के लिए सुप्रीम कोर्ट के दरवाजे खटखटाए हैं। सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने इस चुनौती का जवाब दिया है और इस संवेदनशील मुद्दे को संबोधित करने के लिए स्वीकार किया है जिसमें यह कहा गया था कि इसे लंबे समय पहले संबोधित किया जाना चाहिए था। सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने 11/05/2017 से याचिकाकर्ता को 3 दिन और 3 दिनों के लिए याचिकाकर्ता (ऑल इंडिया मुस्लिम पर्सनल लॉ बोर्ड समेत) के खिलाफ सुनवाई तय की। सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने दो मुद्दों को बनाये रखा है

– क्या तीन तलाक इस्लाम के लिए आवश्यक या मौलिक है?

क्या धर्म के मूल अधिकार के तहत ट्रिपल तलाक को लागू किया जा सकता है?

जबकि संपूर्ण विश्व में भारतीय लोकतंत्र और भारतीय न्यायपालिका की ताकत देखी गई, जहां इस तरह के संवेदनशील और लंबे समय से लंबित मुद्दे “कानून की उचित प्रक्रिया” से सुलझा रहे थे, लेकिन तथाकथित “धर्मनिरपेक्षतावादी” के रूप में लोगों को भी उतना ही आश्चर्यचकित किया गया, जिन्होंने तीन तलाक का बचाव किया एक “अभ्यास 1400 से अधिक वर्षों के लिए” और वास्तव में परोक्ष रूप से सुप्रीम कोर्ट को “अपने हाथों को दूर रखने के लिए और विश्वास के मामलों को छूने के लिए नहीं” कहा गया

सुप्रसिद्ध अधिवक्ता कपिल सिब्बल का प्रतिनिधित्व करते हुए यह धर्मनिरपेक्ष ब्रिगेड, जिसने अपने कैप में बहुत से पंखों को शामिल किया है, जिसमें आरएसएस को महात्मा गांधी के हत्यारों को बुला देने के लिए अब प्रसिद्ध प्रसिद्ध मानहानि के मामले में समर्थक अफजल आजादी ब्रिगेड कन्हैया कुमार को भारत के अपरिचित राजकुमार राहुल गांधी का बचाव करना शामिल है, “1400 से अधिक वर्षों के लिए मुस्लिम समुदाय की प्रथा के आधार पर और इसलिए विश्वास की बात” के आधार पर ट्रिपल तलाक को जारी रखने के लिए अपनी सभी बंदूकों को बचाव, औचित्य और तर्क दिया।

कैसे भारत के संविधान का मजाक उड़ाया जा रहा है, “ट्रिपल तलाक का अभ्यास विश्वास की बात है और संवैधानिक नैतिकता के आधार पर परीक्षण नहीं किया जा सकता”। हिंदू धर्म में राम और उनका जन्म स्थान विश्वास की बात है और इसलिए इनके साथ हस्तक्षेप नहीं किया जा सकता। इसी प्रकार, तीन तलाक भी मुसलमानों के लिए विश्वास की बात है और इसलिए इन्हें हस्तक्षेप नहीं किया जा सकता है।

यहां उल्लेख करना उचित है कि 1 9 50 से अब तक हिंदुओं ने बाबरी-मस्जिद को ध्वस्त करने के स्थल पर राम मंदिर के अस्तित्व का ठोस सबूत और दावा किया है। यह मामला अब भी सर्वोच्च न्यायालय में लंबित है। उन्होंने भारत में लोकतंत्र और सांप्रदायिक सौहार्द के रूप में मजाक उड़ाया, जब उन्होंने कहा कि मुस्लिम सुनहरी ईगल (हिंदुओं का जिक्र करते हुए) से प्रार्थना की गई छोटी मछलियों की तरह हैं और कहा गया है कि सुप्रीम कोर्ट को घोंसले (मुसलमानों के हितों की रक्षा) की रक्षा की आवश्यकता है।

सभी के लिए मानवाधिकारों का घूंघट, उदारवाद के घूंघट और समानता, स्वतंत्रता, गरिमा और अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता के लिए सक्रियता के घूंघट को टुकड़े टुकड़े कर दिया गया। यह “धर्मनिरपेक्ष ब्रिगेड” न केवल सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के सामने खड़ा था, बल्कि भारत के लोगों के सामने, बल्कि मुस्लिम समुदाय में असहाय महिलाओं के सामने भी, जिन्होंने सम्मान के साथ जीने के अधिकार के लिए भारत के उच्चतम न्यायालय के दरवाजे खटखटाए। क्या इसकी मांग नहीं की जा सकती?

Muslim women Right to live with dignity-Is it too much to ask for?

mm

By: Advocate Monika Arora
Arguments of Kapil Sibal in the Supreme Court on the issue of triple talaq lifted the veil from the “secularist brigade” who have been vocal from Sati to Shani Mandir to Jallikattu but kept a “deafening silence” on triple talaq. In fact, when they spoke through likes of Kapil Sibal the supporting inhuman and barbaric triple talaq in the name of “practice followed over 1400 years by muslims”.

These secularists are wrong on both facts and law.  In order to go to any extent to support Muslim appeasement, they misled and misinterpreted the Constitution of India to state that Fundamental Right to Religion is supreme and absolute and superior to the right to equality, freedom, non-discrimination and dignity available to women”. Further Article 25 clearly lays down that Central Government can make laws for majority and also minorities for social welfare.Triple talaq is arbitrary, whimsical, inhuman and barbaric. It violate right to equality freedom, non-discrimination and dignity of women. Petitioners like Shaira Bano and Afreen have been given triple talaq by courier and husbands left. They have no remedy in law and nowhere to go. Hence, they have knocked the doors of Supreme Court for declaring the practices of triple talaq, polygamy and halala as illegal. Supreme Court has responded to this challenge and accepted to address this sensitive issue stating that it should have been addressed long time back. The Apex Court fixed the hearing in vacation from 11/05/2017 with 3 days given to the Petitioner and 3 days to those opposing Petitioners (including All India Muslim Personal Law Board). Supreme Court framed two issues namely

-Whether triple talaq is essential or fundamental to Islam?

-Whether triple talaq can be enforced under fundamental right to religion?

While the whole world witnessed the strength of Indian democracy and Indian judiciary where such sensitive and long pending issue was being resolved by “due process of law”, but people were equally astonished by the stand of so called “secularists” who defended triple talaq as a “practice followed for over 1400 years” and in fact indirectly asked Supreme Court to “keep their hands off and not to touch matters of faith”.

This secular brigade represented by well-known Advocate KapilSibal who has lot of feathers in his cap including defending Pro-Afzal azadi brigade Kanhaiya Kumar to India’s uncrowned prince Rahul Gandhi in the now in-famous defamation case for calling RSS as killers of Mahatma Gandhi, fired all his guns to defend, justify and argue for the continuation of triple talaq on the ground of “practice of Muslim Community for over 1400years and hence matter of faith”.

How Constitution of India was being mocked at by saying “practice of triple talaq is matter of faith and cannot be tested on grounds of Constitutional morality”. How majority community was mocked at by saying that in Hinduism Ram and his birth place is a matter of faith and so cannot be interfered with. Similarly, triple talaq is also matter of faith for muslims and hence cannot be interfered with.

It is pertinent to mention here that since 1950-Hindus are in Court litigating and showing credible evidence of existence of Ram Mandir at the site of now demolished Babri-Masjid. The matter is still pending in Supreme Court. He mocked at India as a democracy and communal harmony when he stated that Muslims are like small birds prayed by golden eagles (referring to Hindus) and stated that Supreme Court needs to protect nests (read interests of muslims).

Veil of human rights for all, veil of liberalism and veil of activism for equality, freedom, dignity and freedom of expression was shredded into pieces. This “secular brigade” stood bare in front of not only the Supreme Court, but before the people of India but also in front of helpless women in Muslim community who knocked the doors of highest court of India for right to live with dignity. Is that too much to ask for?